Chemical SOP
Microbiology SOP
Warehouse SOP
Manufacturing SOP
Information technology SOP

Risk Assessment for Stability Samples not Charged

Risk-Assessment-for-Stability-not-Charged

Failure to charge (place) stability samples as per the approved protocol is a significant GMP deviation that may compromise product shelf life justification and regulatory compliance. A structured risk assessment is essential to evaluate the impact and determine appropriate corrective and preventive actions (CAPA).


🧭 Key Risk Areas to Assess

πŸ”¬ 1. Product Quality Impact

  • Was the product already distributed or released?
  • Is there any other batch/study that covers similar data?
  • Are worst-case conditions covered by other samples?
  • Could the missing sample affect critical quality attributes (CQAs)?

πŸ“… 2. Regulatory Impact

  • Is the batch part of a regulatory filing or annual stability commitment?
  • Could this result in a data gap in product shelf-life justification?
  • Will it impact ongoing or upcoming submissions (e.g., ANDA, NDA)?

πŸ“ˆ 3. Compliance Risk

  • Breach of ICH Q1A(R2) stability requirements
  • Non-compliance with SOP or Stability Protocol
  • Risk of audit observation (FDA, MHRA, etc.)

πŸ§ͺ 4. Scientific Justification

  • Are stability trends available from other batches?
  • Is a matrixing/bracketing approach applicable?
  • Was the product stored under recommended conditions regardless?

πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ 5. Human/Process Error

  • Identify root cause (e.g., manual tracking error, system failure, training gap)
  • Assess failure in scheduling, documentation, or sample accountability

βš™οΈ Risk Assessment Tool (FMEA or Qualitative)

Risk ElementAssessment
Severity (S)High (for regulatory filing batches)
Occurrence (O)Medium to High (if process is manual)
Detection (D)Low (if not detected until late)
Risk Priority Number (RPN)S Γ— O Γ— D β†’ Use to prioritize CAPA

βœ… Recommended CAPA

  • Immediate Actions:
    • Inform QA and Regulatory Affairs
    • Log deviation and perform impact assessment
    • Update stability inventory and tracking system
  • Corrective Actions:
    • Add a replacement batch/sample if feasible
    • Provide justification in the stability report
    • Inform regulators if required
  • Preventive Actions:
    • Automate tracking systems
    • Review training effectiveness
    • Enhance SOP for sample charging and verification

πŸ“‹ Documentation Must Include

  • Date of omission discovery
  • Protocol details (batch, conditions, time point)
  • Root cause and impact assessment
  • CAPA plan and responsible persons
  • QA and regulatory review and approval

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!