Chemical SOP
Microbiology SOP
Warehouse SOP
Manufacturing SOP
Information technology SOP

RISK BASED INSPECTION [SCHEDULE M-POINT (39.3)]

Schedule M – Point 39.3 (Microbiology Lab) in a Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) focuses on whether the firm has an appropriate microbiology laboratory layout and can briefly describe it (with a layout drawing, if available). CDSCO In RBI, this point is treated as high-impact because poor layout can cause false positives/false negatives, cross-contamination of cultures, and unreliable microbiological decisions affecting batch release.

What “layout” should demonstrate (what inspectors expect)

Inspectors typically expect the layout description/drawing to clearly show:

  • Dedicated, separated microbiology lab and support equipment (e.g., autoclaves, glassware handling) away from production areas.
  • Sufficient space and defined zones for samples, reference organisms, media (including cold storage if needed), testing benches, incubators, and records—so activities don’t overlap and create mix-ups.
  • Segregation of activities (by space or by time): sample preparation, media/equipment prep, and enumeration/handling of cultures should not interfere with each other; sterility testing must be in a dedicated area.
  • Separate air supply / separate AHU provisions for microbiology labs, with suitable temperature/humidity control and air quality that does not become a contamination source.
  • Restricted access and defined entry/exit & gowning rules, aligned to containment needs.

For facilities performing sterility testing, RBI often goes deeper: WHO expects sterility testing under aseptic conditions equivalent to sterile manufacturing standards, typically Grade A unidirectional airflow (or equivalent) within a Grade B background, and the layout should prevent disruption of airflow patterns.

How RBI verifies compliance (practical checks)

RBI inspectors usually:

  1. Compare the layout drawing with the actual lab walk-through (flows of people, samples, waste, cultures).
  2. Check whether zoning supports prevention of cross-contamination and reduces risk of erroneous results (false positives/negatives).
  3. Sample evidence that high-risk zones are controlled (access logs, EM where applicable, cleaning/disinfection, incident handling).
  4. Escalate inspection depth when microbiology risk is high, consistent with risk-based inspection planning principles (scope and intensity adjusted to patient/product risk).

Common RBI gaps: no dedicated sterility area, crowded/overlapping zones, shared storage for sterile media and cultures, poor airflow segregation, and layouts that don’t match real operations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!